Delightful Drams from the SMWSA

Is it possible for someone to be too busy to sit down and drink whisky? If you’d seen my schedule for the last six weeks the answer would be…wow. But, I managed to sneak in a few tastings of the Scotch Malt Whisky Society of America’s September offerings in over the course of those weeks. After knocking out a ridiculously surprising offering from a grain distillery this evening, I’m ready to rock the notes and hopefully tempt your noses, mouths and toes and cockles.

Cask No. 2.81 – 15 Yrs. Old; 59.9% alcohol

Color: Copper

Nose

Moss, orange, perfume, raisin coffee cake, musk; With water: Breakfast tea, butterscotch pudding, raspberry, pressed leaves

Palate

Woody, sulfur, lemon Pledge, ; With water: Hot spice like Red Hots, walnuts toasted in brown sugar and butter, chewy wood

Finish

Metallic, sulfur; With water: Fiery, charcoal

Overall impressions

I really liked this dram. The aromas and flavors were wildly diverse, which I found appealing. To continue with that diversity, I suggest pairing it with foods ranging from soft and tangy cheeses to delicate and flaky grilled fish.

Cask No. 125.48 – 12 Yrs. Old; 52.1% alcohol

Color: Yellow topaz

Nose

This makes me smile. Orange,cereal, rose water; With water: New leather loafers, honey, orange almond cookie

Palate

Yum. Yum. Malt, orange, kiwi, blackberry, hibiscus, faint spearmint. Bring it to me!; With water: Nutmeg, green tea, malt, leather

Finish

I can’t pay attention to the finish. Too happy from the taste; With water: Very warm and embracing. Coating.

Overall impressions

Oh, I just loved this one! This is why I drink whisky. There was so much happening here and all of it was wonderful. Even at cask strength it was simply lovely. I wouldn’t bother pairing this whisky with anything. In fact, I wouldn’t bother sharing it with anyone. This is one of those bottles you reach for when you’re alone, pour a responsible, yet delightful dram, sit back and smile about friends, life and living.

Cask No. 23.72 – 9 Yrs. Old; 66.4% alcohol

Color: Light gold

Nose

Peat that seems to come more from the water used by the distillery than from peat smoke; cedar, nice smoke, rich fruit – pineapple in a honey syrup; With water: Charred wood, sherried nuttiness, soft mint

Palate

Very tingly, but not only from the alcohol, pears in syrup, slight candied orange, leather glove used while cutting wood; With water: I could not find a balance with water, despite different percentages of reduction. What I did get was chewy ash, brown butter sage sauce, and a lot of esters. I lost the fruitiness

Finish

Very hot and returning; With water: biting

Overall impressions

As soon as the aroma hit me at full strength and with that first drop of high alcohol on the palate, I thought, “Bruichladdich.” It reminded me of whiskies I sampled in the warehouse there (and I was correct). Despite the high proof, I loved it at full strength, though you have to be delicate on the nose and palate. I struggled to find the right water balance. Rather, I failed to find the right balance. The official tasting notes say, “Don’t rush it.” I agree. I think you should let it sit for one minute per percentage of alcohol you reduce it by. I finally found the profile had softened and become more subtle after I let it sit for 20 minutes with a 20-25 percent water reduction. I still preferred it cask strength. Ride the thunder if you can.

Cask No. G1.8 – 21 Yrs. Old; 62.9% alcohol

Color: Straw

Nose

Fresh apricot pie with syrup, new grain, clean, fresh hay, delightful, fudge, and in a way, almost like a bourbon; With water: S’mores – graham crackers, marshmallow, chocolate, dried rose petals?

Palate

Chewy, nice wood, fruit cocktail; With water: Great spice and more chew – like tobacco chew, crème brulee with a hearty dusting of cinnamon, burnt toasted flakes

Finish

Nice, a bit chalky; With water: Fiery

Overall impressions

This grain offering surprised me. I didn’t think it would be as complex as it turned out to be when it hit the glass. Sacrilege, I’m sure, but I kind of want to add a dash to a lemon caper butter sauce for a white fish. Or a dash in a cream of potato soup. I think interesting things would happen. As for drinking it, I found it holds up very well on its own and would be a nice complement to a personal collection that is looking to add grain.

These offerings are available to SMWSA members. Information on their website at http://www.smwsa.com/.

On a side note, SMWSA is holding its fall Extravaganzas throughout the U.S. starting next month. Below you will find the dates and locations for the events. Tickets can be purchased by clicking here https://www.amerisurf.com/singlemaltextravaganza/form_tickets.html. Enter the promotional code WGR2012 to receive 10 percent off the ticket price for non-members. These events are great ways to sample a number of different drams, including rare ones from the SMWSA.

Washington, DC
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
JW Marriott Hotel
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004

Philadelphia
Thursday, November 1, 2012
The Union League Club
of Philadelphia
140 South Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Los Angeles
Friday, November 9, 2012
Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel
1700 Ocean Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90401

San Francisco
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The Intercontinental San Francisco
888 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94103

Seattle
Please contact SMWSA for Seattle Extravaganza information

Fort Lauderdale
Thursday, December 6, 2012
The Seminole Hard Rock
Hotel & Casino
1 Seminole Way
Hollywood, FL 33314

Posted in Reviews and Tasting Notes | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Delightful Drams from the SMWSA

​Whisky Guy Does Daytime Brews

For a guy who primarily writes about whisky which he enjoys drinking at night, writing about beer that he sampled during the day seems a bit out of sorts. In fact, it is. While I’ve written about beer before, I tend to enjoy it, rather than really think about the details of what I taste. Anyone who knows me also knows that I genuinely dislike drinking during the daytime – even the slightest sip makes me want to nap for the afternoon. So why in the world am I writing this piece?

Enjoying some potato salad and a brat at Hollywood on Tap on the New York streets backlot at Paramount Studios.

Good question and for that I have a good answer. My whisky and beer loving fellow drinks writer Angelo from Booze Dancing sent an opportunity my way to check out the Hollywood on Tap craft beer festival last weekend. Angelo couldn’t make it due to living on the other side of America. The event was held at Paramount Studios here in Los Angeles, which is 10 minutes from where I live.

The event, which benefited The Blank Theatre, was held on the Streets of New York backlot set at the studios. You couldn’t have asked for a better setting (unless it was lit up for nighttime – which would have suited my tasting preferences better). The old time narrow streets were jammed with craft beer booths, only broken up by the occasional food truck which emitted wonderful arrays of aromas. I went for Germany’s Famous Bratwurst which has long been a food truck favorite of mine. I mean brats, sauerkraut, potato salad and beer? I’m from Wisconsin!

There were several dozen craft beer booths at the event, many featuring California craft breweries and microbrews. There were so many dozens of styles to choose from and so many pours to be had that I decided to stick with what has been one of my latest kicks: Imperial Stouts. A big, bold flavor for early in the day, but hey, if you’re going to play, might as well go all in.

The two winners for the Imperial Stouts were from Haven Gastropub in Pasadena and JT Schmid’s in Anaheim. Each offered unique takes on the style, with the Haven clocking in at 12.0 percent alcohol and the JT Schmid’s at 8.0 percent. Haven had a touch of rhubarb on the nose and some tart aromas, was very chewy on the palate with lingering chocolate on the back end. Schmid’s, which spent some time in French oak casks from a California winery, had a huge wine and cream nose, with the waft of toasted chestnuts. The palate was dark cacao and chewy wood. It was definitely my favorite Imperial Stout and maybe the overall favorite at the event.

It wasn’t all Imperials I sampled, as I had that bratwurst to contend with, and it needed a lighter mouthfeel. I still went big with taste, as I paired it with an IPA from Tap It Brewing in San Louis Obispo. SLO yo! That was an IPA people were buzzing about and for good reason. It had all the best characteristics of an IPA in spades. I won’t dig down into the details, as my palate was likely tainted by sauerkraut. However, I could tell it was very, very good.

Kate, from Ruhstaller, lets Girl Plus Fire blogger Paulette Fontanez try one of their California-made brews.

The only beer to challenge the Schmid’s as my favorite beer was a rather surprising choice for me to even sample in the first place. Ruhstaller, from Sacramento, had a late harvest wet hops beer called Blue Heron Hop Yard. To the best of my knowledge I’ve not had a wet hops beer before this one, which was made using hops sourced locally by the brewery. The Blue Heron had almost winey characteristics in its nose and taste. The beer was light on the nose, but earthy. On the palate, sweetness was balanced by a smooth hoppy flavor. This is a seasonal release, and I’m going to do my best to hunt down a few bottles before the season ends.

All in all, this was an excellent event and drew a pretty good, young crowd. I hope some of these craft breweries see bumps in sales after events like this because California needs to keep great beer choices like these alive and well. Give a boy a break from whisky once in a while.

Posted in Reviews and Tasting Notes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Scotch Fall Extravaganza Coming to D.C., Philadelphia & LA!

Did you miss the recent whisky event in Los Angeles? Did my summary of the evening whet your appetite for sampling fine whiskies and meeting the people behind the dram? You still have a great chance to do so. The Scotch Malt Whisky Society of America (SMWSA) is holding their Fall Extravaganza in Washington D.C. on Oct. 30, Philadelphia on Nov. 1 and Los Angeles on Nov. 9. Other events are scheduled for San Francisco, Seattle and Fort Lauderdale.

I love SMWSA events primarily because you get the chance to sample the Society’s bottlings (I have some recent reviews here and here). They have some wonderfully unique Scotches that you just can’t find anywhere else. Of course, there will be dozens of other drams to sample and the chance to chat with distillery representatives. The last event I went to, I focused on ryes. For me, the Fall Extravaganza provides the opportunities to focus on Scotches. Plus, a Friday evening in November is about as close as we get to a real autumn night here in LA, and nothing eases that chill like a good whisky.

For information about the event and tickets, visit here. You can use the code WGR2012 to save $15 on the non-member price.

All the events are from 7:00pm-9:00pm and include a really nice dinner buffet. Registration begins at 7:00pm. Business casual, Jackets preferred. No denim or athletic attire – though I’d imagine the denim rule would have to be waved for LA. Throw on a jacket and that’s our version of of business casual, and we wear it well. Very well.

Posted in Whisky and Writing | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Scotch Fall Extravaganza Coming to D.C., Philadelphia & LA!

Whisky Live LA was a Rye Experience

Whisky Live LA was held Wednesday night in Century City. For me, it was more like Whiskey Rye, as that seemed to be my theme of the evening. With nearly 200 whiskies being poured, there was a significant measure of pick and choose, at least for me. The guy who kept shoving into my back at the end of the evening at the Purple Valley Imports table seemed to have plowed through the event to get, well, plowed. He kept mumbling to Purple Valley’s infinitely patient Raj Sabharwal about needing “just a little more” of the Glenglassaugh 26 yr. old. At least that’s what I think he was mumbling as his glass kept darting past my head in the direction of the bottle. He probably should have done more picking and choosing instead of chugging and probably eventual spewing.

The Knob Creek Rye was one of the many nice ryes   I had at Whisky Live LA held in Century City.

The Glenglassaugh was one I’d particularly looked forward to savoring, as I’ve had a couple of independent bottling of about the same age. The whisky was quite good, with the salty, malty, fruity flavor I’d expected. Like that dram, the rest of the event was also very enjoyable, as there were few people who had indulged the way I’ve seen at other whisky events I’ve attended through the years.

With an event like this, it helps to plot a path of tasting, rather than bouncing from a big peaty blast to an American new make to a Tasmanian port-tinged whisky. You don’t want to whiplash your palate too much throughout the evening. Rye was my primary route in large part due to participating in a Whisky Cast tasting panel hosted by Mark Gillespie. I was joined by Andy from the LA Scotch Club and Marty, who was perhaps from the PLOWED Society, perhaps not…such is its secret. But, Marty was obviously someone who could hold up to the PLOWED standards without getting plowed. Wow. Four uses of plowed in three paragraphs. This is turning into a farming manual. Anyway…

We sampled the Temptation, Hudson, Bulleit and the soon-to-be released Dickel ryes. I am partial to ryes to begin with so I scored a touch higher than the other two distinguished drammers, but we all agreed the Bulleit was the clear winner for boldness with the other three coming in a virtual dead heat due to their subtle profiles. The three milder ryes seemed more introductory pours for someone who does not know rye than something I’d reach for in a rye mood. That being said, the Temptation, which was the first we sampled, seemed to shapeshift by the end of the tasting after it had been sitting out for a while. I don’t know where it was going, but it was going somewhere interesting.

I dabbled in some Knob Creek and High West ryes, which were nice. High West also had an ambitious blend of rye, bourbon and peated blended Scotch they call Campfire. There weren’t many particular notes I could pick out, but the overall mouth feel and flavor was very well balanced and intriguing. Another departure from rye that I took was the Great Lakes Distillery Pumpkin Seasonal Spirit – distilled from Milwaukee’s Lakefront brewery’s pumpkin lager.  A whiskey? Nah. But, darn tasty this Halloween season with notes of cloves, cinnamon and, of course, pumpkin. Personally, I would pair it with apple cider donuts. Those of you who have been to a Wisconsin apple orchard or pumpkin patch in the fall know exactly what I’m talking about.

There were several big winners on the night for me, including the Elijah Craig 20 poured for me by Heaven Hill’s Andie Brokaw and Whiskey Professor Bernie Lubbers. You just can’t go wrong with that single barrel bourbon. I asked Bernie if there were any particular constants the powers that be look for in the Heaven Hill single barrel bottlings. After a moment of consideration he said, “Great whiskey!” The professor is always right, kids. Other whiskies that had me excited were the Breckenridge Distillery’s bourbon, which was lovely, and the Bulleit Rye. OK, I had it twice. I had to have a sip when chatting with Hollis Bulleit, being polite and all. But, as anyone who knows me knows, I’ve long-been a fan of Bulleit’s products, whether they’re made in Kentucky or Indiana.

For the most part, I didn’t partake of many Scotches, aside from two big bang, slam dunk, holy moly, yowzers drams poured surreptitiously by my fellow Whisky Cast panelists. I won’t go into details except to say both Scotches were older than the last girl I dated, much more complex and endlessly more enjoyable. If these two Scotches were combined into one lass she’d be called Ellen G. Nach. Whisky geeks can figure them out from there.

I didn’t sample too many whiskies at the event, but there were none that really missed. Sullivan’s Cove Tasmanian whisky, aged in a port cask, was raved about by the ambassadors who noted the praise it has recently received. I didn’t mind it, but can’t say I really had the chance to savor it. I believe it’s the type of dram that needs more thought and time than a quick sip while being jostled at a whisky event. I hope to try it again.

I suppose the biggest miss of the evening came not from a whisky, but from me when I chatted with the ambassador of Canadian whisky which I will not name. Boy, I pissed her off. I mentioned that I had given up on Canadian whiskies years ago when I struggled to find Canadian whiskies that I enjoyed. I asked what she could do to change my mind. I was honestly talking about the whiskies she had to offer. Maybe she thought I was talking about her short dress, but she quickly turned as cold as a January night in northern Alberta after I said that. Then again, it was the last pour of the evening, and I would imagine five hours of having increasingly inebriated men gawk at you would cut one’s patience short.

My friend Aaron Trask asked very politely and nicely for a photo with the Ardbeg pourers and they were happy to oblige. It bothers me when people don’t treat the people behind the table with the respect they deserve.

In fact, I’d say the biggest winners at these events are the people behind the tables. They have to stay kind and focused while having people pressing for bigger pours, challenging them about ridiculously obscure distillery information, cozying up to them like they’re an old friend, and taking a second and third glance because of the alluring outfits they’re wearing. I seriously don’t know how these pourers put up with me. I mean, with other people.

Posted in Whisky and Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Whisky Live Rolls Into LA Oct. 17 With 150 Whiskies

“I don’t drink whiskey, but I love bourbon.”

“I love Scotch, but I’m not a fan of whisky.”

“I had this great Scotch from Canada.”

All of these are things I’ve had people say to me when they learn I write about whisky. I patiently listen to their proclamations and then gently tell them that they’re wrong. Wrong. WRONG!!!

O.K., I don’t scream at them. But, I tell people there’s a whole world of whisky for them to discover and understand. And, if that have that initial interest, such as enjoying bourbon, Scotch or a Canadian whisky, then they should explore more of what the wonderful world of uisge beatha has to offer. And, along the way, they’ll learn that bourbon and Scotch are both whiskies, Scotch is only made in Scotland, and places as far flung as India, Tasmania and Japan make some wonderful whiskies.

My first real understanding of whisky came when I spent a weekend at a whisky expo in San Francisco. This fall, there seem to be a number of whisky events popping up around the country (and world, for that matter – I’m talking to you, London). One of the first big ones here in LA is Whisky Live, happening October 17 at the Hyatt Regency Century Plaza in Century City.

Whisky Live lets guests interact with whisky industry representatives and sample their many unique products.

Whisky Live is a full on event with live music, a great buffet, special cigar events, and most importantly, a full  range of over 150 of the world’s finest scotches, bourbons and whiskies. Events like this are important for whisky novices to have the chance to expand their palate by trying some whiskies outside of their comfort zone. They’re also helpful for people who already enjoy a range of whiskies, but want to see what new expressions are available. Personally, I’ve tried most of the whiskies available at these events, but I look forward to chatting with the industry representatives to hear about mutual acquaintances and to catch up with old friends.

In addition, there are opportunities to attend master classes taught by industry experts. These classes provide details on particular expressions that expand the tasting and pairing experience.

Tickets to this event are $139 for VIP entrance and $109 for general admission. The code “la2012”will knock those prices down a bit. For more information, visit: http://www.whiskylive.com/usa/49/los-angeles-2012

Make sure to check out my Twitter updates from the event. Maybe I’ll see you there!

Posted in Whisky and Writing | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Whisky Live Rolls Into LA Oct. 17 With 150 Whiskies

Three Glenrothes Expressions Worth Attention

I’m continuing my recent trend of guest reviewers as I move into three recent Glenrothes expressions. This time, my guest is Girl+Fire blogger Paulette Fontenez. Paulette is a huge whisky fan, as she frequently reminds me in her Tweets, Facebook posts and texts. Her love of the liquid is not limited to drinking it – Paulette also likes to experiment with using whisky in cooking, as evidenced by her whisky applesauce (which I was lucky enough to enjoy after this tasting). Speaking of which, here are our thoughts on the Glenrothes 1995, 1988 and 1978 releases.

1995 (bottled 2011) – 43% alcohol – $75

Color: Medium gold

Nose

Rob:  Vanilla, apples, currants, grain, orange oil polish; With water: hibiscuses, zinnia,

Paulette: Waffles, maple syrup; With water: Caramel with sea salt

Palate

Rob: Orange, all spice, orange-cranberry muffin; With water: Caramel, day-old charred wood, red cherry, shaved walnuts

Paulette: Spicy, all spice, tingles like spearmint, citrus; With water: sherry

Finish

Rob: Rolling warmth. Very nice. Hugs; With water: Not nearly as lingering. There and gone.

Paulette: Warm, metallic

Overall impressions

I liked this. I must admit that I’ve been disappointed by Glenrothes expressions the past 6-7 years or so. Not that they were bad, but they were just unremarkable. Drinkable, but not something I craved. They seem to have turned a corner with this expression, recapturing some of the intrigue that came with their 1991 and 1992 expressions. This pours well and drinks better.

1988 (bottled 2009) – 43% alcohol – $150

Color: Butterscotch candy

Nose

Rob:  Grapes, nicely balanced with honey, lemon cream sandwich cookie, vanilla, pineapple cake; With water: Going out in Hollywood on a Saturday night – perfume multitude osmosis, flying cocktail splashes, lounge furniture that has been well loved and, well, had lovers lounging.

Paulette: Dried fruit (raisins) apple/pear, seductive; With water: harsher, grass, went from classy to trashy, but not in a bad way

Palate

Rob: Grape Jolly Rancher, honeysuckle, white pepper; With water: That chewy orange candy grandma always keeps in a jar on the coffee table, more honey, apple, slight tarragon, after short wait licorice rushes to the front

Paulette: Toffee and mixed candy; With water: More toffee and licorice.

Finish

Rob: Glowingly warm, settles in for a chat; With water: Cloves and Tabasco. Kind of like a Bloody Mary

Paulette: Tongue coating, warm syrup/honey; With water: Licorice and Tabasco.

Overall impressions

My fellow Los Angeles-based whisky writer Tim Read says he’s not found a Glenrothes that really excites him. I think this is a fine place to start. All kinds of action happening here. I think where it might suffer a touch is when you add water. Water really livens up the nose and palate, but thrashes the finish. I guess that’s the beauty of whisky tasting – you have a full experience, a full journey with the liquid if you take the right route. The journey may not always be smiles and Disney songs, but it will be lively and intriguing. Both Paulette and I thought this would pair well with cream-based foods like a chicken pot pie for the main and a caramel cream dessert of some sort.

1978 (bottled 2008) – 43% alcohol – $700

Color: Copper

Nose

Rob:  Heather, grass, ripe fruits, baked lime bundt cake; With water: Antiseptic, apricot compote, rocky

Paulette: Sugar cane, molasses; With water: Brown butter

Palate

Rob: Christmas cake, butterscotch, kale cooked in a Sweettart reduction (Not that I’ve had that, but I want to try it after tasting this); With water: Chewy, more Christmas cake, but with big presents and cheerful carols, slight woodsy-ness, sherried

Paulette: Cinnamon; With water: Chewy, walnuts, fruity

Finish

Rob: Falls flat. Pond water. Earthy, vegetative; With water: Much better finish. The happy glow of a Christmas Yule log.

Paulette: Smooth, silky, soothing, rich

Overall impressions

Well, as you can see Paulette was so overwhelmed by the beauty of this dram she could hardly describe it. But, the words she chose were happy and comforting, just like this whisky. I loved it. You want to stay up with it next to the fireplace and hear scary ghost stories and tales of the glories of Christmases long, long ago.  Again, it runs into the trouble that the other expressions had: unevenness between the nose, palate and finish. In this case, the nose and palate were amazing without water, but the finish, for me, didn’t do much. Add a drop of water and the nose diminishes but the palate and finish explode. Would I recommend this at $700? Yes. There are some wonderful aspects to this whisky, and though it doesn’t always fire on all cylinders, if you can afford to drop $700 on a Scotch, you’ll not mind the ride.

Posted in Reviews and Tasting Notes | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Three Glenrothes Expressions Worth Attention

SMWSA Offerings Turn Up the Heat in a Heatwave

To write about Scotch at this moment is counter to everything that my body is feeling. Los Angeles is mired in a heatwave and the temperature topped the 100 degree mark for the third straight day, today. But, I have some real gems from the Scotch Malt Whisky Society of America’s late August run to share with you, so soldier on I will. As an added bonus, this week’s guest nose belongs to none other than Bo Smith of the Life Imbibed. A trained sommelier, seasoned foodie and whisky aficionado, Bo knows imbibing. He offers some interesting perspectives on this selection of four malts.

Cask No. 76.84 – 21 Yrs. Old; 57.8% alcohol

Color: Burned desert floor

Nose

Rob:  Kippers, light smoke, peaches and cream, slight mixture of dried fruit package; With water: Late spring sunset with dew-tinged budding flowers, orange zest, rich compote, Oh Sherry!

Bo: Old tobacco, caramel; With water: Strawberry compote, quince

Palate

Rob: Warm herb bread, salty, long-forgotten wood pile, spit on the baseball mitt; With water: Warm sugar coated pecans, coffee butter cake

Bo: Leather, coffee hints, dried apricots with goat cheese; With water: Nutmeg, burned oak, vanilla

Finish

Rob: This may come out wrong, but it’s an appealing skunkiness. That’s meant as a compliment; With water: High-fives its way all the way down the throat and back

Bo: Fulfilling hug of the throat

Overall impressions

This is a wonderful, wonderful malt. This would be fantastic if paired with something that has some sweet-glazed sugar coating, like bananas Foster or crème brulee. But, really, it’s a dram you pour to impress. A very thoughtful dram. Save this one for the good, good friends.

Cask No. 39.83 – 28 Yrs. Old; 53.9% alcohol

Color: Butterscotch

Nose

Rob:  The first whiff off the nose is like walking into a room full of Grandma’s potpourri. And she’s in the kitchen making rhubarb pie; With water: A well-loved old textbook, warm plum sauce

Bo: Orange marmalade, sea breeze, a pretty airiness, floral, light blossoms; With water: Shortbread, old damp wood must, orange burst

Palate

Rob: Unexpected based upon the first nosing: White pepper, Tabasco, more gripping plum sauce; With water: Now it gets fun: Trix cereal, honey, nettle tea, wafts of paint thinner, roasted prickly pear with dusts of vanilla

Bo: Ripe cherries, chocolate covered cherry cordials; With water: Buttered fruit cake, cardamom, puff of sweet cigarillo, medium sweet caramel

Finish

Rob: A massaging cactus

Bo: Medium, soft, warm coating

Overall impressions

This was a really interesting selection. I was shocked to find that I thought it should be paired with pork or with game meat. Why shocked? I don’t eat beef, pork or game meat and haven’t for well over 20 years. Nonetheless, something primeval senses that this dram would go quite well with hearty side of meat. A dram this complex is a shapeshifter with water, air and time. But, the one constant is that it is really damn good.

Cask No. 4.153 – 11 Yrs. Old; 58.6% alcohol

Color: Straw

Nose

Rob:  Lilacs, grass, s’mores where the marshmallow dipped too close to the coals; With water: Musk, rose lassi (the Indian drink, not the Scottish girl), mixed fruit salad in a sickly sweet syrup

Bo: Woodsy, touch of smoke; With water: Oranges, paper chemicals

Palate

Rob: Chewy with tar and ash; With water: An ashy Tandoori oven with all the spices expected in an Indian kitchen, cacao, burned cereal, some butane.

Bo: Earthy, green tea fruit punch; With water: Floral, but with spices like pepper and paprika, rich smoke

Finish

Rob: Warming with waves and waves from a furnace. Like my throat went firewalking

Bo: Medium, straight down the middle

Overall impressions

I mentioned how hot it is outside right now, and this is definitely not a dram for summer. Save this one for the cold nights. It’s a nice aperitif or good for a toast with the boys before the groom steps out into the church to say “I do.” I think it would be great with a soft cheese, even one that is smoky. I don’t think the combined smokiness will be too much. The dram would even complement a smoked salmon.

Cask No. 53.157 – 10 Yrs. Old; 58.0% alcohol

Color: Light beams

Nose

Rob:  This. Is. Islay. All of it – the peat, the sea air, the sheep…stuff. And, I love it! Barbecued brisket, Worcestershire sauce, cloves, grapefruit and lavender sorbet; With water: Water really mellows the dram. Lemon bar, grist mill, baked ham hocks.

Bo: Seaside cabin with a fire burning, a Scottish fall walk with a warm wool sweater and a hot toddy, vintage car seats; With water: Black licorice dipped in sea salt and black pepper, baby powder,

Palate

Rob: Dancing spices and sugar plums with stabs of hot cinnamon, huge orange Pixie Stix embrace; With water: Very balanced, cherry pie with a zest of orange on the crust and a wheatgrass chaser

Bo: Blast of youthful exuberance, gasoline, chunky fruit nougat candy bar; With water: Red peppercorns, warmed maple syrup, pear with full spices

Finish

Rob: Scratching Tandoori ash on the tongue with a lingering ember

Bo: Tikka masala, warm, soothing

Overall impressions

When I lived on Islay, I would often walk from my cottage through a few fields down to the Sound. I would sit on the rocks near an abandoned fishing shack and write as the aromas of Caol Ila, just up the beach, rolled down the Sound, mixing with the sea air. This dram took me right back to that pebble beach. Wow. Hands down the most intricate nose of all four whiskies. Staying with the island theme, but moving far away from Islay, I actually think this would pair well with Polynesian food – think pineapple glazes and coconut milk sauces. Bringing it back to the U.K., it would also go with fatty goose liver pâté. Top it off with some chocolate crème pie. Not a dram to drink alone. There’s way too much happening with it. You’ll want to share your thoughts. And, maybe a little of your whisky.

These offerings are available to SMWSA members. Information can be found on their website at www.smwsa.com.

On a side note, SMWSA is holding its fall Whisky Extravaganzas throughout the U.S. starting next month. Below you will find the dates and locations for the events. Tickets can be purchased by clicking here https://www.amerisurf.com/singlemaltextravaganza/form_tickets.html. Enter the promotional code WGR2012 to receive 10 percent off the ticket price for non-members. These events are great  ways to sample a number of different drams, including rare ones from the SMWSA.

Boston
Thursday, October 11, 2012
The Taj Boston
15 Arlington Street
Boston, MA 02116

Chicago
Thursday, October 18, 2012
The Union League Club of Chicago
65 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604

Washington, DC
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
JW Marriott Hotel
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004

Philadelphia
Thursday, November 1, 2012
The Union League Club
of Philadelphia
140 South Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Los Angeles
Friday, November 9, 2012
Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel
1700 Ocean Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90401

San Francisco
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The Intercontinental San Francisco
888 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94103

Seattle
Please contact SMWSA for Seattle Extravaganza information

Fort Lauderdale
Thursday, December 6, 2012
The Seminole Hard Rock
Hotel & Casino
1 Seminole Way
Hollywood, FL 33314

Posted in Reviews and Tasting Notes | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SMWSA Offerings Turn Up the Heat in a Heatwave

Mythic Structure in Non-Fiction Storytelling. And Scotch.

“This whisky will set you back $700.”

The whisky adventure is rewarded as Caroline and I enjoy our Glenrothes 1978 which retails for $700.

The words still the chatter, the breath, of thirty strangers into submission. The wizened man with the strange accent standing in the middle of the room eases a glass of bronze liquid to his lips. He beckons the mesmerized menagerie to do the same…

***

Years ago, Hollywood story analyst Christopher Vogler set the screenwriting world afire with his book, “The Writer’s Journey” which meticulously detailed mythic structure in storytelling. The book deconstructed storytelling to its age-old essentials of archetypes found along the stages of a journey. The book was practically required reading for those trying to break into screenwriting at the time. The “secrets” that Vogler shared were essentially the same things Joseph Campbell had taught decades before, which were what Jung had exposed an earlier generation to, and which were embedded in tales from the dawn of civilization.

Mythic structure exists in stories. The elements serve as shorthand for the human psyche, allowing us to bring our anticipations and expectations to a tale, which frees the storyteller from meandering details that detract from the essence of a story. Mythic parallels are found in stories ranging from, “The Hobbit” to the Academy Award winning movie, “The Artist” to the independently-published phenomenon, “Fifty Shades of Grey.” Admittedly, some mythic stories are better than others.

Archetypical elements can also be applied to non-fiction storytelling. To do so doesn’t mean a writer rewrites the truth. Rather, a writer shapes the perspective of a particular realistic situation to capture the flow of a mythical journey and peppers the telling with the archetypes familiar to us all. One sees this done in everything from war stories to celebrity biographies. With the right touch, it can even be applied to a whisky-tasting luncheon.

Every story needs a hero, a person whose journey leaves the reader or audience more knowledgeable or fulfilled than at the beginning of the story. He’s the sometimes rash, sometimes reluctant, soul who leaves his fellow villagers on a quest to return with the secret potion that will save them all. Along the way, the hero encounters a cast of archetypes that challenge or expand elements of his psyche while reflecting elements of the human condition. The basic counterparts to the hero are the mentor (wise man who teaches the hero and gives gifts like a magical elixir); Threshold guardian (the wary watcher who stops the unworthy from entering); Shapeshifter (often the opposite sex who changes her appearance or mood); Shadow (whose opposite-shade qualities are the unrepressed, unrealized side of the hero); and the Trickster (the cause of mischief and catalyst for change who cuts big egos down to size).

While I’d hardly classify myself as a hero, my stories tell of journeys through a particular event, moment or thought process. I take readers on a ride that hopefully has some kind of arc for me and for them. Such is my hope with the tale of the Grand Adventure of the Whisky Luncheon. Join me on a mythic journey as I seek to bring to you knowledge of the secret elixir known as The Glenrothes:

The Californians from Saturday Night Live.

August. Los Angeles. A Monday afternoon that puts the H-E-double-hockey sticks into hot. I have left behind the cool confines of my home for a maze-like trek to downtown Los Angeles – Wilshire to La Brea to the 10 to Grand to 8th to Spring. Straight out of The Californians.

With me is Caroline Macey, a bourbon-loving beguiling blonde who likes complex cocktails and simple songs. She’s an actress who is affiliated with some of the best mixology bars in SoCal. This is the first whisky tasting event she’s ever attended. She’s excited. Nervous. Eager. Unsure of how to present herself in a room full of writers and whisky wolves.

Four text messages rock my phone during the dodgy drive downtown. Each gets progressively cheekier. They’re from James Armstrong, owner of Showgun Studio – a powerhouse event production company. My old Aussie pal is already at the luncheon, sampling the pre-presentation cocktails and chastising me for being late. It’s not me James. It’s the traffic. Always the traffic.

Caroline and I arrive 15 minutes late for normal time, or 15 minutes early for LA time. In either case, the first person we encounter as we walk up the stairs of downtown LA’s newest gastropub, The Parish, is James. He smiles at Caroline and smirks at me.

“You can’t possibly be on the guest list for this fine event,” James mellifluously mocks me, as a good Trickster does.

The words, but not the tone, snake their way into the ears of a brunette a few feet away. She holds the trademark tool of a 21st Century Threshold Guardian – a clipboard. She hurries to investigate my interloping, but I preempt her wariness when I say her name before she speaks.

“Danielle?”

She stops.

“I’m Rob Gard. Whisky Guy Rob.”

The clipboard sinks to her side and her opposite arm rises in a hug. Danielle and I have been exchanging emails about the luncheon for weeks. This is our first meeting. After brief introductions all the way around, Danielle departs to check on the validity of new arrivals. Caroline, James and I finish a round of cocktails before weaving our way to a table to ready ourselves for the luncheon presentation.

I sit across from a pretty woman who has kind eyes and a warm voice. In other circumstances I’d be more flirtatious with her. But, this is a professional lunch, I tell myself. And, I cannot possibly breach protocol. Even if it is my own self-imposed protocol. So, we talk casually, politely, about different alcohols. Travel. The kind of general things that serve as a fire blanket to flirtation.

As we wrap up our chat, a guy rumbles up to our table. His gel-dappled hair, Vans, jeans and a slightly wrinkled short sleeved shirt say the right amount of care went into looking like he doesn’t care. It’s an LA-look through and through, pulled off well by someone who has the air of knowing nighttime drink hot spots the way Dracula knows blood banks. The woman I’d been talking with turns to him.

“You look familiar,” she says inquisitively.

“Do I? Did I sleep with you? You’re the kind of girl I’d sleep with. But I don’t know if you’d sleep with me. I hope I was good.”

His rapid-fire response and irascible irreverence draws a genuine laugh from the woman. The man is a well-known drinks writer, radio host and all-around drinker. In his world, he talks about whisky while drinking it, bar-hopping from live location to live location, surrounded by enthusiastic crowds. In mine, I write about whisky in lonely rooms, out of sight and out of mind from the rest of the world. I’m not sure if he’s my Shadow or I am his. In either case, he has her rapt attention, in fact, the attention of the whole table, and I don’t. And, I’ve no idea how to get it back.

The train of thought is disrupted by a hush incited by a handsome middle-aged man walking into the middle of the room. Even before a single word escapes his mouth we all know this is Scotch whisky expert and ambassador Ronnie Cox. We eagerly lean forward to hear him reveal the mysteries behind the latest Glenrothes releases. I try to catch his eye to see if he recognizes me. I’d met Ronnie years earlier in San Francisco at a Whiskies of the World expo. He was one of my first whisky Mentors.

Ronnie insists we go around the room for individual introductions, and the crowd obliges. Magazine editors, bloggers, drinks industry representatives. Caroline’s turn is next. Timidity is thrust aside as she confidently describes her work with craft cocktail lounges, proving she belongs here as much as anyone. This is not the uncertain person I arrived with earlier. She has shown true Shapeshifter form.

Ronnie Cox (standing) makes us earn our first sips of Glenrothes.

Introductions finish and Ronnie begins to speak about alcohol. However, the name Glenrothes does not reach our ears. Ronnie has decided to describe a gin that sits in the portfolio of Berry Brothers & Rudd, who also own Glenrothes. This is a gin that isn’t even in the building today, let alone at our tables. The brief segue turns into a long gin soliloquy. People’s attention drifts and backsides do the seat shuffle. Just as he is about to lose the audience to a sea of squirming, he breaks into story about gin that is so fascinating, it draws us back to him and makes us think we’d have died the worse for not knowing that particular gin fact.

Wise man that he is, Ronnie’s stories about other drinks in the portfolio have stretched into the first hour of our luncheon. The result of his oratory obstacles is that everyone is drooling for a single drop of Glenrothes. We want it desperately, ache for it, need it more than life itself.

It arrives.

The anticipation has made the first sip of Glenrothes 1995 all the sweeter. Ronnie deftly leads us through the flavor notes he picks up in the whisky and, to my surprise, refers to me to support a point he makes about water and whisky. He does indeed remember me.

We continue with the Glenrothes 1988 as a glow begins to take shape in the room. It’s not the alcohol that causes this effect; rather, it’s the alcohol experience that Ronnie is leading us through. Again, attention drifts from the presentation as people get lost in the enjoyment of the whisky and the delicious dishes paired with the dram. Ronnie immediately snaps us back as glasses of Glenrothes 1978 are delivered to the tables.

“This whisky will set you back $700.”

The words still the chatter, the breath, of thirty strangers into submission. The wizened man with the strange accent standing in the middle of the room eases a glass of bronze liquid to his lips. He beckons the mesmerized menagerie to do the same.

The whisky is sublime. An array of flavors hug and tap the tongue. As Ronnie describes what he tastes in the dram, I realize that I may not have a radio show or be instantly recognizable when I walk into a room, but I do know whisky. Without hesitation, I share my thoughts about the expensive dram with the others at my table. People’s ears perk up as they hear me verbalize what they’re tasting. My observations overlap with Ronnie’s as our words weave past each other until finally, they meet.

“Christmas cake,” he and I say simultaneously. The woman across from me laughs with amazement, and I nod with appreciation. I raise a toast in Ronnie’s direction. I have absorbed his lessons well.

What began as an ordinary journey from my home hours earlier evolved into an adventure of new experiences, new faces and new knowledge. I could have chosen to write about the experience from a “history of Glenrothes” and “tasting notes” (which will come soon) point of view. Instead, I looked through the lens of mythic structure to bring the reader into that world in a way that straight reporting doesn’t. That’s the beauty of writing versus blogging.

It’s also why this thing is so damn long and took a week to put together halfway decently. I think I’ve earned myself a dram of Glenrothes. Maybe even the Christmas cake kind.

Posted in Whisky and Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Reviews of Four SMWSA Offerings for August

As I stated in my recent post, Lost in Translation, I’m going to be doing more regular reviews of whiskies. I promise not to ramble on and on about what I’m tasting by evoking esoteric imagery. I’ll save that for my regular blog. I’m more of “get right to the impressions/descriptions” kind of guy. That being said, I must offer a lengthy prelude to my review of four recent Scotch Malt Whisky Society of America offerings.

I’ve not been shy to note, tweet, whine, whimper and bemoan the horrible allergy attack I’ve been under for the past 10 days. The siege of my sinuses has left me unable to smell much of anything – not to mention has given me an almost constant headache, lethargy, etc. Nosing whisky is mighty hard when one’s nose knows no smell. I’ve taken formal nosing/smell tests and rank in the top 10 percentile of “noses” when it comes to identifying aromas. My snout is a shell of itself these days.

A thought hit me a couple of days ago, however, that inspired me to stop sniveling about my sniffles and dive into my Glencairn glasses. I realized that at every tasting I’ve conducted or attended, there’s always at least one person in the audience who has no idea what everyone is talking about when we start letting go with our flowery descriptions of whiskies. We wax about the wafting aromas of passion-fruit tinged sticky toffee pudding, and they think, “I kind of smell something sweet?” We boldly declare, “Tar! Charcoal! Socks dried out over a campfire!” They think, “Maybe smoke?”

In other words, not every nose is going to know what we are describing when we go into exuberant explanations about whiskies. But, those people still appreciate a good dram, despite feeling underappreciated for the quality of their nasal cavities. People like that need a symbol. Someone they can look up to. A hero for olfactory outsiders near and far. And so, just as Batman inspired the lost souls of Gotham, I have chosen to nose and review whiskies under considerable nasal duress. And while I don’t have an exact Catwoman counterpart (which is good considering how allergic I am to cats – though I could make an exception for Anne Hathaway) I do indeed have a foil for my pharynx.

My friend Sarah agreed to sample the four SMWSA whiskies with me. I gave Sarah her first tasting lesson two years ago and immediately noticed her excellent ability to pick up nuances in a malt. Not only was she able to identify interesting aromas, but her descriptions closely matched what I was picking up in the dram. I could think of no one better to lend me an assist in my disabled state. We made our notes separately for each dram and compared after each tasting, so we did not unduly influence each other. I was relieved to find out that our descriptions were generally not too far off, so my nose isn’t completely out of whack (though I struggled to pick up nutty and chocolate notes). I also find it interesting how we closely matched each other, but didn’t necessarily pick up what the SMSWA tasting notes described (which we didn’t read until after we tasted). That’s the beauty of tasting – there will be different opinions that will help give a broader overview of the complexities of the sampled malts.

Speaking of which, let’s finally get to those. We did not score these whiskies, but will offer detailed notes on what we notes picked up and our general impression of the given malts. Here we go:

Cask No. 7.69 – 8 Yrs. Old; 61.6% alcohol

Color: Bright yellow

Nose

Rob:  Candied Christmas cake, Cajun spices, fresh cardboard; With water: Floral bouquet, spring laundry

Sarah: Play Doh, pear, yeast, swimming pool; With water: Vanilla, cinnamon apples, banana

Palate

Rob: Baked apple tart served on a leather plate, buttery cream; With water: Cotton candy, yeast, chili rubbed satay with mint sauce

Sarah: French apple pie, light caramel, banana; With water: Sharp lemon, fruit basket (basket included!) hints of grass, wicker furniture, peppercorn

Finish

Rob: Cooling, icy-hot; With water: Just like Mo Farrah going for the gold – a long distance runner with a great sprint at the end

Sarah: Short, but some lingering caramel glow at the back of the mouth

Overall impressions

This definitely required some water to take down the peppery aspects in favor of the softer flavors. This is a good dram for when you’re not sure what you’re in the mood for. Hits a lot of notes.

Cask No. 30.68 – 10 Yrs. Old; 60.6% alcohol

Color: Peach

Nose

Rob:  Medicinal smoke, apple cobbler, honey, heather; With water: Fresh apple butter croissant, lavender, thistle weed

Sarah: Yeast, faint grass/yard trimmings, raisins, plums, orange zest, faint peat; With water: Lighter and cleaner, pears and spices, hard candy

Palate

Rob: Oily, orange with cloves, burning plastic; With water: Cardamom, ginger cookie, chewy forest wood, moss

Sarah: Butterscotch, orange zest, lemon cookies – tastes like you should be standing in your grandmother’s kitchen while she bakes with antiquated spices; With water: Gingerbread, candied ginger

Finish

Rob: Long, chewy orange candy; With water: Lingers more

Sarah: Very long, warmly full bodied, lingering

Overall impressions

We read the SMWSA tasting notes after comparing ours and had to double check to make sure we were drinking the right sample bottle. For the most part, our impressions were similar to each other, but quite different from the official tasting notes. That being said, this dram seemed to shift from interesting to more interesting to even more interesting with each additional sip. It was our favorite of the quartet and was perfectly enjoyable without water.

Cask No. 24.122 – 16 Yrs. Old; 53.0% alcohol

Color: Pale gold

Nose

Rob:  Sweet, clean, pears in syrup, faint aroma of campfire on clothes; day old cinnamon rolls, hay; With water: Yeast, Sweetart package, cherry, lemon, pine needles

Sarah: Acrid, fire in a forest, full-bodied, moist undergrowth, peeling paint, cinnamon, vanilla, baking; With water: Grassy, pine cones

Palate

Rob: Charcoal – where did that come from? Pine; salt  With water: Gazpacho, pine cone sap, ash, celery, sweet spices

Sarah: Orange, cloves, cinnamon muffins; With water: Earthy, pine cone and nuts, burned sugar, fills the mouth like a loaf of bread

Finish

Rob: Where are you going? You just got here!

Sarah: Short and sweet. Fills the mouth and dissipates quickly

Overall impressions

This is a really lovely dram. Nice balance between woody notes, spices, sweetness, and fruits. It seems to be just moving into its own as the wood and spirit reach equilibrium.

Cask No. 3.182 – 21 Yrs. Old; 46.4% alcohol

Color: Cloudy gold

Nose

Rob:  Peat smoke, medicinal cabinet, shortbread, tangerine, faint vegetation; With water: Pineapple cake, wet cut grass, violets

Sarah: Sharp, smoky peat with soft citrus, floral undertones, warm hearth; With water: Composted grass, orange peels

Palate

Rob: Oily, hot, orange zest, charred wood, tobacco tar, grapefruit; With water: Hot spicy peat, candied walnuts

Sarah: grapefruit over deep peat; With water: softer, dandelions in the field after a rain, floral bouquet

Finish

Rob: Fleeting, but pleasant With water: waves of tangerines

Sarah: Medium, sharp peaty. High-pitched.

Overall impressions

A tough nut to crack was this one. I guessed (correctly) that it was a Bowmore, which I always struggle with getting a finger (or a nose) on with great authority. There’s a lot here that is quite nice, but nothing that jumped out and hugged me like several other Islay malts do, or kissed me like Bruichladdich does. This is a bottle that requires you to settle into the armchair in front of the fireplace late at night and push on to dawn to fully unlock all its secrets. And that is not a bad thing at all.

These offerings are available to SMWSA members. Information is available on their website.

Posted in Reviews and Tasting Notes | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Lost in Translation – The Language of Whisky Reviews

“For relaxing times, make it Suntory time.”

Bill Murray gamely tries to be enthusiastic with that line take after take in the 2003 movie “Lost in Translation.” His character, Bob Harris, has fame and has money – including a cool $2 million for doing a series of Suntory ads in Japan. What he’s missing is the ability to understand exactly what Suntory wants him to convey in their new whisky ads. He doesn’t speak the language of the director and the photographer; he doesn’t trust what his interpreter is telling him; in other words, his role in telling the story of this whisky is lost in translation.

Lines between whisky makers and those who communicate their stories are frequently blurred. Let’s face it. If you want to add funds to build that dream island home, writing about whisky is likely a futile effort – though I do have one whisky writing friend who has successfully done just that. I’m one of the fortunate few to get paid for writing about whisky when I was a columnist for a couple of magazines and also did reviews. A handful of people make a bit of money with ads on their website from distilleries. But, for most whisky writers, there’s not much cash from the cask.

Instead the writing is driven by passion. Drinks companies tap into that passion by offering their products to some writers in exchange for reviews or stories. But, as with Bill Murray sitting there with a Suntory in his hand, what exactly does the drinks company expect you to say about their product? IS there an expectation? Bill Murray was getting $2 million, so he’d best get the message down correctly. There’s a contract at stake. For those reviewing whiskies for free at the behest of distilleries, there may not be a contract, but the entire legitimacy of the reviewer’s website can be made or broken by the access the writer has to new and interesting whiskies. Does that cause a writer’s nose and palate to tip favorably in the direction of a whisky company? Or, for the sake of unassailable objectivity regarding reviews, should a writer spend anywhere from $20 to $500 per bottle to remain independent of distillery expectations? Or should they rely upon sample exchanges with other whisky enthusiasts?

Reviewing whiskies is something I’ve done in the past and still do on occasion. I’ve been trained; I’ve been tested; I’ve been published. As much as I enjoy whisky and writing about the individual characteristics of unique malts, I’ve made it clear that the focus of this site, in the words of whisky blogger Josh Feldman, is to “write beyond the liquid.” My interest in whisky is in the metaphors and connections it has with the larger world and with life.

But, I still enjoy a damn good dram.

Recently, I was one of several bloggers asked by the Scotch Malt Whisky Society of America to review a few whiskies of theirs each month. I was hesitant about this proposition, as I cede there are ample whisky reviewers in this world, many of whom do an exemplary and engaging job of explaining their impressions of what they are tasting. Does the universe really need another regular whisky reviewer? How many more “smells like wet leather on a sunny mid-morning while standing behind my grandmother’s rose garden shed on the third day after the first day of spring lathered in Old Spice and butter” descriptions does the whisky world need? And, what does an entity that provides samples expect of my reviews?

In fact, the answer to the challenge that faces bloggers who rely upon free samples for their reviews is found within the whisky community. The easy flow of communication throughout the community serves as a kind of translator of truth. Opinions and understandings of the flavor and aroma profiles of whiskies will vary from person to person, sometimes considerably. But, if a reviewer consistently goes against the impressions of his or her peers to the favor of the sample provider – if they keep evoking Sean Connery instead of a Roger Moore, to continue the “Lost in Translation” metaphor – they will be revealed as not speaking the lingua franca of the general community. They may have won over the distillery marketing department, but they will have lost the audience the distillery needs to reach.

What does all this mean to me in my consideration of expanding my role among the legions of reviewers? Hello. I’m being sent some incredible whisky. Of course I’ll do it! As much as I love the deeper layers of thought that the whisky universe sparks in my mind, you can never drift too far from the liquid, or what’s the point? Plus, regular reviews will help me keep my nose and palate sharp – if I ever get over this seemingly endless allergy attack suffocating my sinuses the past week.

So, look forward to more frequent reviews from Whisky Guy Rob. I will do my best to translate the complex tale of a liquid, to tell the story my nose knows and to speak the language my mouth feels.

“Seriously? Rob still thinks he has a shot with me?”

And if that fails, I’ll just fall in love with Scarlett Johansson. Again.

 

Posted in Whisky and Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lost in Translation – The Language of Whisky Reviews